Julie Williams Sadly Leading the Parade of Lies, Again

Yesterday morning, a most disturbing allegation started playing over the airwaves in the Denver metro area. You can read more about those allegations here:

Jeffco Recall Gets Very Ugly, Very Fast

This morning, the right-wing Independence Institute released a new video spot featuring embattled Jefferson County school board member Julie Williams. In today’s video, Williams makes a tearful accusation involving her son Randy, who is identified in the video as a “special needs student.”

The summary version is that Julie Williams, whom we all know as one of the members of the Jeffco BOE embroiled in a bitter recall battle, has gone on television recounting a conversation that she claims she had with her special-needs son (her words, not ours) that may have left him “scarred forever.” According to Williams, her son claimed that he was forced to carry a recall sign in a parade that he also claims to have led. Commercials are short, so Williams does not produce any evidence that this actually happened.

What Williams fails to mention is that Jeffco Schools investigated her claim about this very issue last fall and found no evidence whatsoever to substantiate this claim.

You can read the full details of the Jeffco Schools investigation here. The short version is that Williams asked Jeffco to investigate, originally giving them the date of Sept. 8, and later suggesting that perhaps it had been Sept. 18 or 22. District personnel looked at 240 hours of video footage from Standley Lake High School (SLHS) on all three dates and found no evidence of any kind of protest or parade.

SLHS was closed on Sept. 19, 2014 — which is the day that SLHS students protested along Wadsworth Boulevard. However, classes were cancelled before students arrived and students did not walk out of school. Williams presumably did not drive her son to school on the 19th, knowing that school was closed.

Total taxpayer cost for that investigation? $3,780.14.

To recap:

  1. Williams’ older son was not asked to carry a sign or lead a protest or parade of any sort at SLHS.
  2. Nearly $4,000 was spent to determine that Williams’ son did not carry a sign or lead a protest at SLHS.
  3. WNW are scared and trying any stunt they can in hopes that you’ll believe their lies.
  4. Williams and her allies have provided no other alternative information or evidence about what parade this was that she and her son are referring to, how he came to be at the helm of this parade, or who was supervising him during this time and allowed this to happen. She doesn’t mention the costly investigation that she prompted that found nothing. Not a single person has corroborated the story, and not a single photograph has been produced…because it didn’t happen.

It is time to RECALL Witt, Newkirk and Williams.

Vote YES on the recall. Then vote for a Clean Slate who will respect the community, and bring true transparency and accountability to the Jeffco School Board.

Vote for Jeffco School Board candidates Ali Lasell in District 2, Amanda Stevens in District 3.

Then vote yes to recall Julie Williams and choose Brad Rupert as successor candidate.

Then vote yes to recall John Newkirk and choose Susan Harmon as successor candidate.

Then vote yes to recall Ken Witt and choose Ron Mitchell as successor candidate.

And please spread the word.


 

 

Story #3 from 2013-2015 Poll Results: Williams Suggests Whitewashing Social Strife from AP U.S. History; Civil Disobedience Ensues

The Mask Came Off. The People Woke Up.

students

Last week, we put forth a poll asking you to select the Top 10 most disturbing stories out of the 30 that we selected from the current Jeffco School Board majority’s tenure.

We are amidst counting down the Top 10, as voted on by more than 400 people. Today is Story #3:

What Happened: We trust that our readers are as familiar with this story as any other, as it dominated local news for a full week, captured heavy national attention, and even attracted significant international attention. A quick summary is helpful though, especially as WNW try to distort what really happened. The focal point is the exact language that Julie Williams used in her initial curriculum review proposal:

“Materials should promote citizenship, patriotism, essentials and benefits of the free enterprise system, respect for authority and respect for individual rights. Materials should not encourage or condone civil disorder, social strife or disregard of the law. Instructional materials should present positive aspects of the United States and its heritage.”

Note that this language does not say “materials should present a balanced view of U.S. History;” it does not use any terms suggesting a mix of the good news and bad news about the history of our country. Instead, it uses simple terms that can easily be read by anyone as censoring negative aspects of U.S. History. When WNW later said that they were just seeking something more balanced than what was in the books, perhaps that was true, but that’s not the interpretation of the language that many smart people — yes, including students — derived from reading the proposal.

Fueling the fire were Williams’ bizarre follow-up comments. First there was the admission that she actually didn’t read the class framework before putting forth the proposed language. We don’t need to comment on that…

Second was an assertion that important figures in U.S. history were excluded from the course. How she could have understood that without reading the framework is head-scratcher. Worse, it’s simply without merit. The framework didn’t include every name of every important person…because it’s a framework. It’s like looking at a table of contents and objecting that a specific person isn’t listed in the TOC, even though they’re discussed in the book. Anyone teaching AP U.S. History should teach about the Founding Fathers and MLK, and our guess is that every last one does. But that doesn’t mean that those individuals are listed in detail everywhere.

Recently, the College Board, the company behind AP classes like AP U.S. History, added some of the individuals that Williams complained about into the framework. That is not a vindication of Williams or of some other Tea Party activists who made the same claim around the country. It was political appeasement that’s tantamount to adding a few specifics to a Table of Contents.

Of course, everyone knows the rest of the story, with a few teacher sickouts and student walkouts from every corner of Jeffco. More information about that sequence is contained in our Story #10, which was the whole new story created by Witt and Newkirk calling the students “ignorant” “pawns” after the walkouts. [In fact, we’d note that the votes received for these two stories put together would have made it the #1 story, but the split in votes means that they both appear in our Top 10 from our reader poll anyway.]

2013-2015 Poll Results: School Board Story #10: Witt and Newkirk Call Jeffco Students “Ignorant” and “Pawns”

Last week, we put forth a poll asking you to select the Top 10 most disturbing stories out of the 30 that we selected from the current Jeffco School Board majority’s tenure. We presented many that didn’t make the cut; and they were troubling enough.

Why It Mattered: Two reasons: 1) the mask came off; and 2) the people woke up.

Prior to Williams’ proposal, there was still a holding out among many in the community that discontent with the school board was only related to teacher pay, and that teachers were just complaining. Insiders knew differently, but sometimes it takes an event like this for people to see the true colors of their elected officials. This wasn’t just a matter of poor wording on Williams’ part. Do you believe that if there hadn’t been community outrage, that Witt and Newkirk would have had any problem passing the language just as it was? We believe that they were all just fine with that language, and only scrapped it because of the community and national outrage. What this proposal did was give us a glimpse into who this board majority is; they are not just your pleasant locals cheerily looking for ways to be more transparent and determined to give parents a little extra choice. No, they are puppets in a national effort to try to take over school boards, privatize the districts they’re sworn to protect, and in the mean time usher in a new era of extremist indoctrination so that the next generation will align not just with healthy conservative principles like fiscal responsibility and law and order, but also with conservative ideology like a view of American Exceptionalism that somehow sees God’s light as shining solely on our country and justifying any mistakes that we’ve made. This proposal told us a lot about WNW and what they were trying to hide. For that we thank Julie Williams for not being very reflective and a loose cannon.

Second, this incident woke people up. There is a time in this fight to take back Jeffco Schools from outsiders that was pre-AP U.S. History proposal, and then there’s the time since this proposal. The difference has been stark. Before Williams’ proposal, a relatively small but energetic cadre of people were closely following the school board’s shenanigans. Since that proposal, we have a whole lot more sentinels and watchdogs throughout the county. Board meetings have been packed, and traffic on our site and many others has been double or triple what it was before. WNW had been executing the Dougco and Koch Brothers education “reform” playbook to perfection, in their minds. That playbook undoubtedly says to keep things just quiet enough to be able to deflect most criticism. This incident made a whole lot of people think “that’s not who we voted for!” and they’ve been watching much more closely ever since.