Teacher Executions Now Recommended on Julie Williams’ FB Page, by Her Long-Time Friend

Troubling pre-publication note: As we publish this article, Julie Williams has still not deleted this person as a friend from her Facebook page, though she is deleting others who are complaining about the situation. Wow.

company

The rhetoric around the recall is of course heated. But now, multiple, fresh calls for the execution of people, specifically teachers’ union members, that are pro-recall, especially among Julie Williams’ friends, is frightening on a whole new level. Read on for a brief history of how we’ve gotten to this point. [Please note that we are opting to not publicize this person’s name in this article, though there are plenty of screenshots of these online exchanges in our possession, and others have already posted some of them].

December 2014 — JCSBW reported on the fiasco of Newkirk and McMinimee speaking at an event that was “mistakenly” advertised as being co-sponsored by a white supremacist organization.  Following that report both our Facebook page and blog were inundated with vile, hate-filled messages from this former Republican State House candidate, including this message:

I AM ORGANIZING AGAINST YOU AND I ALSO WILLS TART TRACKING THE NAMES OF ALL TEACHERS AND STUDENTS WHO FALL UNDER YOUR SPELL AND WILL OUT THEM SO THEY WILL NOT GET INTO THE COLLEGES THEY WANT AND THE TEACHERS WILL BE SUBJECTED TO PUBLIC RIDICULE.
YOU ARE NOW MY ENEMY! GO **** YOURSELVES!

At the time we deemed them to be threatening not only to us, but to students and staff that opposed the board majority.  Those messages along with our concern for school safety were reported to Jeffco School Security and to the Jeffco BOE.

The security response?

After reading your email and the attachment it appears that the comments and statements are not intended for Jeffco Schools but are directed towards Jeffco Boardwatch.

Jeffco Public Schools strives to be a safe and welcoming environment free from threats, intimidation and disruption for all students, staff and visitors.  Our ability to provide a quality education begins with mutual respect and safe practices that are consistent throughout the District.  Should you receive information that directly targets or threatens our school, students, staff or District, please forward any information as soon as possible.”

(We do think the threats to track teachers and students were a threat on our schools but we opted to not give this person any more attention, while being watchful of him.)

Now this same person has returned on the scene to spew even more direct threats to those that support the recall, stating that pro-recall people and union members should be executed and our children expelled after swift justice (specifically, he recommends “within 24 hours”) from a “conservative” tribunal.

This time his hate and threats have been reported to the sheriff’s office.

The bigger issue is WHERE he posted these threats — on Julie Williams’ Facebook page!

Because her page is private, only friends can post to the page.  Now, we understand we probably all have a friend that has spouted off something we didn’t agree with and couldn’t control.  But to have a friend that promotes executing those in disagreement? That is something difficult to justify.

We can already hear the excuses: “She can’t control what other people say.  She didn’t know he was like that.”

Maybe — if this were his first offense.

March 2014 — This man runs for a state House seat and makes these same type of hate-filled statements.  He was asked to step down as a candidate and in subsequent interviews stated that he was asked to run originally by none other than Tim Neville, Williams’ brother-in-law.  Neville denied the claim, yet Williams approved this man as her Facebook friend — a man her family knew is a white supremacist who makes threats online.

December 2014 — JCSBW reported his threatening activity to the Jeffco School Board, but Williams still approved this man as her FB friend.

One of Williams’ friends had the courage to stand up to the hate spewed on her page and we commend him.  Unfortunately, his post remained up for hours and Williams didn’t do a thing about it.

We can’t control everything our friends say.  But we ask, would you even be friends with this person after you knew what kinds of things they wrote?

And what if they wrote was an insistence upon the execution of the people you’ve been elected to lead?

company 2

Keep fighting, JeffCo! And VOTE! 

Vote for a clean slate: Lasell, Stevens, Rupert, Harmon, Mitchell


 

 

Story #5 from 2013-2015 Poll Results: Witt and Newkirk Premeditate Abusive Student Privacy Violation

Last week, we put forth a poll asking you to select the Top 10 most disturbing stories out of the 30 that we selected from the current Jeffco School Board majority’s tenure.

We are amidst counting down the Top 10, as voted on by more than 400 people. Today is Story #5:

What Happened: The backstory is fairly convoluted, so we’re going to mostly leave it to the Colorado Pols version, which includes a video of Witt and Newkirk conniving:

Investigation Underway Into Alleged Student Bullying By Jefferson County School Board, Staff

We wrote two weeks ago about an ugly and perhaps legally actionable incident that occurred at the May meeting of the conservative-controlled Jefferson County Board of Education.

The summary is that WNW’s continuous battle with Jeffco Students for Change reached a boiling point several times before this episode. When the students requested a meeting with the school board, WNW rejected the students’ request. That’s unfortunate, but not surprising.

What was surprising was that Ken Witt and John Newkirk had obviously pre-planned to “out” one of the student leaders, to everyone’s surprise, by showing personal information and calling her out at the public school board meeting, including an accusation of her being “racist” because she “favorited” a joke on Twitter that was critical of disgraced former Communication Director Lisa Pinto. Again, the backstory is complex and these stories are meant to be summaries, but let’s just say that that the “racist” accusation was a such a stretch that most people were scratching their heads about how such a connection could even be drawn. Furthermore, WNW’s organizer and previously censured Board member Laura Boggs had also “favorited” the same tweet, but of course she wasn’t called out. In a world of politically correct stretching often called out by conservatives, the “racist” stretch was dumbfounding to the extreme, but nonetheless what remained in people’s minds was two board members colluding to smear a student for simply “favoriting” a tweet that other people “favorited” as well, including their own allies.

Why It Matters: In two words, No Boundaries.

You can hear yourself thinking “OK, maybe they lie, cherry-pick, exaggerate, are hypocritical, are controlled by outsiders, and don’t know much about education, but of course they have boundaries when it comes to kids.”

“OK, maybe not on that last one either.”

That’s a big deal.

A chicken-guarding-the-henhouse investigator found no formal wrongdoing, of course, but suggested that the behavior was unprofessional and could have been handled much better. More importantly, according to some observers, the result was easily manipulated by the fact that in requesting the investigation of itself, the board did not include emotional distress as a result of the bullying but limited the inquiry to physical bullying.

Sound familiar? The board asking for an investigation of itself? With a tightly worded question designed to exclude the actual wrongdoing?

On top of the actual fact that a student and student’s family were deeply upset and unsettled, this whole episode was much more than a breaking down of the idea that “they wouldn’t go there with kids, would they?” barrier that some of us may have still had. It was also about their rank amateurism in dealing with conflict, and the way they spend their time. Over the past two years, it always seems as if they’re making hasty, coached decisions when it comes to actual substantive topics, but they’re spending a lot of time on stunt-planning. The fact that this was so obviously pre-planned, amidst a bunch of substantive discussion items that had been given short shrift, was a reminder that WNW’s primary “solutions” to education are about optics, power, and control, and not actual substance…or caring about students as individuals.

School Board Ballot Day & You: 300 Words, 2 Years, and 2 Million Page Views

Today, the first November 2015 Jeffco ballots are being mailed out.

In two years, we’ve had approximately 2 million views on our website and Facebook pages, which averages out to 6 views for every voter in Jeffco. We are grateful that so many have spent time to research what’s going on, but all of it will be for naught if the election keeps WNW in power.

We know that the differences are stark, but not everyone does:

WNW + Merritts + Johnson are financed almost entirely from sources outside Jeffco, like the Koch Brothers. The “Clean Slate” of Rupert, Lasell, Stevens, Harmon, and Mitchell, is not.

When considering what’s best for Jeffco, WNW + Merritts + Johnson look to those financiers and attorneys like Brad Miller who have been have specially trained to fight public schools. The Clean Slate is an independent group actually listening to Jeffco stakeholders that value public education.

WNW + Merritts + Johnson cynically claim that “kids are first” but are concerned with political posturing, appealing to a narrow ideology, and “who has the microphone.” The Clean Slate is a pragmatic group of skilled professionals that do not march together on all of the issues and do not come with a preordained agenda.

WNW + Merritts + Johnson habitually blame teachers and call themselves “transparent,” and then meet behind closed doors and stake out their next broadside on teachers. The Clean Slate includes two former teachers and a former principal, and they all actively seek input from all Jeffco stakeholders.

If you haven’t yet shared your thoughts with many others, we ask you think about what you might do this upcoming week. Your opinion matters to others more than you think. There are still undecided and even uninformed voters, probably including some of your friends. Many want to know more about what’s going on, but don’t know who to ask. You can make a difference. The future of public education, in Jeffco and possibly across the nation, is at stake.

Clean Slate

Ron Mitchell, Ali Lasell, Susan Harmon, Brad Rupert, and Amanda Stevens

Keep fighting, JeffCo! 

Election day is Nov. 3. Vote!


 

One Mom’s Recommendation: ‘Clean Slate’ of Lasell, Rupert, Mitchell, Stevens, and Harmon

This from a Jeffco mom who trusts teachers:

My daughter’s elementary school teachers came and knocked on my door yesterday to give me a brochure for Jeffco United.

I was so grateful.

They gave their all to their students all day, then they dug a little deeper and found more to give back to our community.

Here’s the bottom line:  Our teachers have been so mistreated by our current school board majority that they were considering a strike.  Instead, they’re collectively donating hundreds of hours of their personal time to support the recall and the five “Clean Slate” candidates Jeffco desperately needs.

It is no surprise that our teachers are feeling re-energized by the possibility of the Clean Slate winning.  Each member is a patch in a quilt that pieces together powerfully.  Here’s how it looks:

Clean Slate

Ali Lasell used her 25 years of teaching in Adams 12 to develop a skilled hand in advocating for all students.  She is willing and practiced at listening to community members, parents, and school employees.

Brad Rupert comes to the voters as the jack of many trades.  His legal background in business, real estate, and his many volunteer hours in agencies helping to provide food to families in need make him an essential player in addressing Jeffco’s facilities and funding needs.

Ron Mitchell is a bold, honest, hard-working man who dedicated his career to Jefferson County Public Schools.  He brings one clear mission back to the table:  Get the politics out and the good teachers back in.

Amanda Stevens is amazingly skilled at listening to many ideas and bringing them together into one workable, thoughtful solution.  Her years in the classroom taught her how to look at the district’s data and turn it into schools addressing the needs of the actual teachers, principals, and students who depend on their school board to make good choices.

Susan Harmon will be an experienced voice for collaboration.  These five candidates may be running together, but that doesn’t mean they always agree.  Susan has the necessary skills to keep dignity, respect, and teamwork at the forefront during times of tough decision-making.

We send our children to Jeffco’s teachers hoping they’ll learn.

Now, we have the opportunity to learn from their teachers as well.  If these are the candidates our teachers are knocking on doors to support, then we need to be the voters that elect a school board they can proudly work for.

STORY #6 FROM 2013-2015 POLL RESULTS: WILLIAMS POSTS LINK TO ANTI-LGBTQ HATE GROUP, SUGGESTS KEEPING KIDS HOME FROM SCHOOL ON “DAY OF SILENCE”

Last week, we put forth a poll asking you to select the Top 10 most disturbing stories out of the 30 that we selected from the current Jeffco School Board majority’s tenure.

We are amidst counting down the Top 10, as voted on by more than 400 people. Today is Story #6:

What Happened: Julie Williams is well-known for posting hyper-inflammatory links on her Facebook feed (example: a speaker suggesting that parents pull their kids out of public schools because teachers are just ‘glorified babysitters’ and that the only reason parents haven’t done it sooner is because they’ve become lazy and dependent) and for not reading things before she develops a strong public opinion about their contents (example: the AP U.S. History framework).

4-18-fb-post

This regular combination of Williams’ habits came together in an explosive way this spring when she published a link on her Facebook page to a savecalifornia.com screed that encouraged parents to keep their kids home from school and “away from perverse indoctrination” on April 17, which had been deemed a “Day of Silence” designed to call attention to the silencing effect of anti-LGBT bullying and harassment. SaveCalifornia is on the official list of hate groups kept by the Southern Poverty Law Center. Williams claimed she didn’t read the SaveCalifornia newsletter before posting it, and later apologized and deleted it from her Facebook page.

By the way, notice the commenters and their comments in the above image.

Why It Matters: Time and again, Williams wrote and said during her 2013 campaign that her “door would always be open to all voices” in Jefferson County. There didn’t need to be any more evidence that she was just stating mindless political platitudes that someone coached her to say, but this kind of action made it clear that if she ever had such an intent, she didn’t understand what it really meant.

Certainly, it was better that she deleted and apologized than not having done so, but the public had by then grown so weary of both her carelessness and her creation of a hostile environment for so many in the district she is charged with helping lead.

Students struggling with sexual orientation have a far higher suicide and suicide attempt rate than average, and experience bullying, depression, and anxiety at significantly increased rates too. If Williams isn’t entirely personally comfortable with sexual orientation questions, the least she could do as a leader of an enormous organization would be to keep quiet about it.

Williams often does not seem to treat her school board behavior any differently than a private Tea Party meeting. She seems to think that her mandate from the voters is so broad that the totally unfiltered Julie Williams is what’s best for the county. While we are increasingly enamored of politicians who “speak their mind,” Williams represents a total lack of discretion when her duty to not be careless is doubled by the fact that the primary people she serves are kids. Even after two years, it’s obvious that she is simply woefully unprepared to be a public official, much less one “leading” an enormous number of youth coming from a variety of backgrounds.